Skip to content

Tools · Comparison

Builder.io vs Cursor vs Windsurf

All three are code assistant tools. Here is what separates them.

Builder.ioCursorWindsurf
What it isOne codebase for engineers, designers, PMs, and marketers. Everyone works from one source of truth, on brand and in code, with no handoffs to clean up.AI-first code editor built for speed with intelligent auto-completion and codebase understanding.An AI-first editor whose agent keeps track of what you are doing across files as you work.
CategoryCode AssistantCode AssistantCode Assistant
PricingFreemium · $24 - $40/moFreemium · $20/moFreemium · Free · Pro $15/mo · Teams $30/user/mo
How it billsFlat monthlyFlat monthlyPer seat
Free tierYesYesYes
RatingNot yet rated4.8 from 4,500 reviewsNot yet rated
Features—
  • AI-native editor
  • Codebase understanding
  • Multi-file editing (Composer)
  • Inline generation (Cmd+K)
  • Multiple AI models
  • Tab completion
  • Bug detection
  • Natural language editing
  • Cascade agent for multi-file changes
  • Project-wide context tracking
  • Runs terminal commands and reads output
  • VS Code extension compatibility
  • Inline and full-file completions
What works
  • Has a free tier, so it can be tried before paying
  • Publishes its price openly — $24 - $40/mo
  • Sits in Code Assistant, one of the better-covered categories here — easy to compare
  • Best AI code editor
  • Understands full codebase
  • VS Code compatibility
  • Multiple model support
  • Incredibly fast
  • Familiar if you already use VS Code
  • Generous free tier
  • Agent keeps context without being told
What does not
  • 97 other tools in this catalogue claim to do the same job
  • Subscription required for full features
  • Can be resource-intensive
  • Newer with some bugs
  • Limited free completions
  • Another editor to keep updated
  • Occasional runaway edits need reverting
  • Heavier on memory than plain VS Code
Visit Builder.ioVisit CursorVisit WindsurfCompare more tools