Skip to content

Tools · Comparison

Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf

All three are code assistant tools. Here is what separates them.

Claude CodeGitHub CopilotWindsurf
What it isAnthropic’s terminal-based coding agent: it reads the repository, edits files, runs tests and commits.AI pair programmer that helps you write code faster with intelligent suggestions right in your IDE.An AI-first editor whose agent keeps track of what you are doing across files as you work.
CategoryCode AssistantCode AssistantCode Assistant
PricingPaid · Included with Claude Pro $20/mo · Max from $100/moPaid · $10-$39/moFreemium · Free · Pro $15/mo · Teams $30/user/mo
How it billsBundledFlat monthlyPer seat
Free tierNoNoYes
RatingNot yet rated4.6 from 11,200 reviewsNot yet rated
Features
  • Multi-file edits across a repository
  • Runs tests and iterates on failures
  • Git-aware, can commit and open pull requests
  • CLI, desktop, web and IDE extensions
  • Extensible with MCP servers and custom skills
  • Real-time code completion
  • Chat-based assistance
  • Multi-file editing
  • Test generation
  • Code explanation
  • Vulnerability detection
  • PR summaries
  • CLI assistance
  • Cascade agent for multi-file changes
  • Project-wide context tracking
  • Runs terminal commands and reads output
  • VS Code extension compatibility
  • Inline and full-file completions
What works
  • Handles whole tasks rather than single lines
  • Strong at understanding an unfamiliar codebase
  • Works with any editor because it lives in the terminal
  • Massive productivity boost
  • Multi-language support
  • Excellent IDE integration
  • Learns from your codebase
  • Active development
  • Familiar if you already use VS Code
  • Generous free tier
  • Agent keeps context without being told
What does not
  • Requires a paid Claude plan
  • Reviewing large diffs takes discipline
  • Token cost adds up on big repositories
  • Requires subscription
  • Occasional incorrect suggestions
  • Privacy concerns with code
  • Can slow down IDE
  • Variable quality by language
  • Another editor to keep updated
  • Occasional runaway edits need reverting
  • Heavier on memory than plain VS Code